Posts Tagged 'metropolitan area'

Widespread Growth Across Metropolitan Areas

Metro GDP map

  • Real GDP increased in 282 of the nation’s 381 metropolitan areas in 2014, led by widespread growth in professional and business services; finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing; and trade. Natural resources and mining also spurred strong localized growth in several metropolitan areas.
  • Professional and business services and finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing contributed more than 50 percent to real GDP growth in 49 and 39 metropolitan areas, respectively.
  • Profession and business services contributed to growth in 314 of the nation’s 381 metropolitan areas in 2014, most notably in Midland, MI (4.56 percentage points) and San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA (2.05 percentage points).
  • Mining in the Permian Basin and Cline formation led to notable total real GDP growth for Midland, TX (24.1 percentage points) and San Angelo, TX (11.4 percentage points). Mining in the Marcellus shale formation contributed significantly to the 9.5 percent increase in total real GDP for Wheeling, WV-OH.
  • In 2014, Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX was the fastest growing metropolitan area (8.5 percent) among economies with populations of 500,000 or more. Midland, TX grew the fastest (24.1 percent) of the metro areas with populations of less than 500,000.

For more information, read the full report.

Economic Growth Widespread Across Metropolitan Areas in 2012

• Metropolitan areas accounted for nearly 91 percent of national current-dollar gross domestic product (GDP). The ten largest metropolitan areas accounted for 34 percent of national GDP in 2012, while the smallest 79 metropolitan areas accounted for less than 2 percent of national GDP.0917blog

• Real GDP grew in 305 metropolitan areas. Durable-goods manufacturing, trade, and financial activities led growth in 2012. Durable-goods manufacturing and financial activities contributed more than 50 percent to real GDP growth in 80 and 53 metropolitan areas, respectively.

• Trade contributed to real GDP growth in 363 metropolitan areas. Growth was strongest for metropolitan areas in the Southwest regions such as Odessa, TX.

• Financial activities contributed more than 2 percentage points to overall growth in real GDP in Missoula, MT; Eau Claire, WI; Bloomington, IL; Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; and Ocean City, NJ.

• In 2012, San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA was the fastest growing metropolitan area (7.4 percent) among economies with real GDP of more than $100 billion. Midland, TX, grew the fastest (14.4 percent) of the metro areas with real GDP of $10–100 billion. Odessa, TX, grew the fastest (14.1 percent) of the metro areas with real GDP of less than $10 billion.

For more information on GDP by metropolitan area, read the full report.

BEA Introduces New Measures of the Regional Economy

Today, the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis released experimental real, or inflation-adjusted, estimates of personal income for states and metropolitan areas. The inflation adjustments are based in part on regional price parities (RPPs), which provide a measure of differences in price levels across each state and region relative to the national price level for each of the years 2007–2011. When RPPs are applied in conjunction with BEA’s national Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) price index, which measures price changes over time, personal income comparisons can be made across regions and time periods. These prototype statistics are being released for evaluation and comment by data users.

PI_1_0612Growth in real state personal income from 2010 to 2011 ranged from 1.3 percent in Mississippi to 10.4 percent in South Dakota. These growth rates reflect the year-over-year change in the state’s nominal personal income, the change in the national PCE price index, and the change in the regional price parity for that state. After South Dakota, the states with the largest growth rates of real personal income are North Dakota (9.5 percent), Iowa (6.1 percent), Nebraska (6.0 percent), and Texas (4.3 percent). The states with smallest growth rates after Mississippi are Maine (1.4 percent), Rhode Island (1.5 percent), Vermont (1.6 percent), and New Mexico (1.6 percent). Four states—Arizona, Indiana, North Carolina, and Oregon—had growth rates equal to the national average of 2.7 percent.

PI_2_0612Growth in real metropolitan area personal income from 2010 to 2011 ranged from a decline of 0.7 percent in Rochester, MN, to an increase of 11.9 percent in Odessa, TX. After Odessa, TX, the metropolitan areas with largest growth rates of real personal income were Midland, TX (10.7 percent), Hanford-Corcoran, CA (6.7 percent), San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA (6.4 percent), and Madera-Chowchilla, CA (6.2 percent). In addition to Rochester, MN, four metropolitan areas had declining or flat growth rates. These are Ocean City, NJ (–0.3 percent), Anniston-Oxford, AL (–0.2 percent), Gadsden, AL (–0.2 percent), and Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL (0.0 percent).

To learn more, read the full report.


Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Archives